Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010373172021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] SATURDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5595/2021 Between:
1.FAROOL BASHA SHAIK, S/O. MAHBOOB BASHA, AGED 27 YEARS, R/O. PEDDA MASEED BAZAR, VINUKONDA, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
2.SHAIK SOUDGAR JANI BASHA,, S/O ABDUL KHUDUS SAHEB, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 19-169, PEDDA MASEED BAZAR, VINUKONDA, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, . rep by its Public Prosecutor High Court of AP, Amaravathi. Through P.S.Vinukondal Town,Vinukonda, Guntur District, A.P. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1.S M SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following:
2 ORDER: No representation for the Petitioners. Sri A.Sai Rohith, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that in the present matter, a chargesheet has already been filed. Considering that four years have elapsed since the filing of the chargesheet and the Petitioners have not sought amendment of the prayer, it appears that the Petitioners are either not interested in prosecuting the matter or that the parties may have arrived at a settlement before the learned Trial Court. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is disposed of granting liberty to the Petitioners to challenge the chargesheet, if so advised, and if the same is still pending consideration before the learned Trial Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 07.03.2026 VTS