Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22566 (CHH)

ASHISH DIXENA v. SMT. ANJALI DIXENA

CRR/1284/2022 · 2026-06-18

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:24977 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 1284 of 2022 1 - Ashish Dixena S/o Shri Santlal Dixena Aged About 35 Years R/o Pali, District-Korba,(C.G.) 2 - Santlal Dixena S/o Late Shri Sutaram Aged About 62 Years R/o Pali, District Korba (C.G.) ...Applicants versus 1 - Smt. Anjali Dixena W/o Ashish Dixena Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Akhrar, Tahsil Lormi, District Mungeli (C.G.) 2 - Ku. Pallavi D/o Ashish Dixena Aged About 8 Years Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Anjali Dixena, Wife Of Ashish Dixena R/o Village Akhrar, Tahsil Lormi, District Mungeli (C.G.) ... Respondents For Applicants : None. For Respondents : Mr. Vikas Dubey, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 19.06.2026 1. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the applicants to press this revision. VAIBHAV SINGH Digitally signed by VAIBHAV SINGH Date: 2026.06.19 18:56:07 +0530 2 2. Heard Mr. Vikas Dubey, learned counsel for respondents. 3. By filing the present revision, the applicants have prayed for following relief(s) :- “It is therefore, that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the revision and set- aside the impugned order dated 10.11.2022 passed by learned First Additional Sessions Judge, Mungeli District Mungeli Chhattisgarh in criminal appeal no. 45/2022 arising out of order dated 25.09.2021 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class Mungeli, Mungeli District Mungeli (C.G.) in Misc. Criminal Case No. 95/2018 and also to reject the both applications for protection of women from Domestic Violence Act of the respondent, in the interest of justice.” 4. As per the status report received, the trial has already been concluded on 10.11.2022. In view of the same, the relief sought in the present revision has become infructuous as nothing survives for consideration in this revision by this Court. 5. Consequently, the present revision is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 6. Interim order, if any stands vacated. 7. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice vaibhav