Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22564 (AP)

A.GOPAL, ANANTHAPUR. v. THE CHAIRMAN & MD., CPDCL, HYD. & 3 OTHERS

WP/15041/2005 · 2026-02-17

Challa Gunaranjan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010363052005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION NO: 15041 of 2005 Bench Sr.No:-35 [3506] A.Gopal ...Petitioner Vs. The Chairman and Managing Director, APCPDCL & Ors. ...Respondent(s) ********** Advocate for Petitioner: Sri SIDDARTH C B Advocate(s) for Respondent(s): Sri Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC FOR APSPDCL, . CORAM : SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 18th February 2026 ORDER: Sri C.B. Ram Mohan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel, representing learned counsel for the petitioner, states that despite making efforts to get in touch with the petitioner, they were unsuccessful and in view of the same, are unable to proceed with the matter and even otherwise, when the writ petition came to be instituted, petitioner was aged 56 years and one of the issues raised being that non-consideration of his case for promotion to the post of Superintending Engineer, by efflux of time, that he would have already superannuated, the cause in the writ petition may not survive for further adjudication. 2 2. Considering the aforesaid submission, the writ petition stands closed and in case, if petitioner claims that the cause continues to survive, liberty is granted to him to revive the writ petition. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if any, in this case shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Date:18.02.2026. cs