Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:24779
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 1175 of 2025 Virendra Kumar Agrawal S/o Late Sohan Lal Agrawal Aged About 62 Years Proprietor M/s Khyati Structure, R/o M/s Shri Ashutosh Structure Pvt. Ltd. Jarway, Hirapur, Raipur (C.G.)
--- Petitioner versus Basant Kumar Agrawal S/o Late Sohan Lal Agrawal R/o Khyati Ispat Pvt. Ltd. Jarway, Hirapur, Raipur (C.G.)
--- Respondent
For applicant : Mr. Arpit Parabh, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Amit Jaiswal, Adv. For Respondent : None, though name of counsel representing respondent is published in cause list. Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Order On Board 18-6-2026
1. Applicant has preferred this MCC for restoration of MA No. 86/2023 which was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 8-9-2025 for want of prosecution.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that, MA No. AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Digitally signed by AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Date: 2026.06.22 11:53:20 +0530
2 86/2023 was listed for hearing on 8-9-2025 but counsel for applicant could not reach the Court when it was taken up for hearing, therefore, it was dismissed for want of prosecution. He further submits that, within one month, application for restoration of the MA was filed. Non- appearance of the counsel was bonafide, hence he prays that, instant MCC may be allowed and the MA No. 86/2023 may be restored to its original number.
3. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the MCC, further considering the fact that restoration application was filed by the applicant within one month from the date of dismissal of the MA, instant MCC is allowed. The impugned order dated 8-9-2025 is set aside. Registry is directed to restore MA No. 86/2023 (Virendra Kumar Agrawal Vs. Basant Kumar Agrawal) to its original number.
4. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge pathak