Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010366492021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] SATURDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5554/2021 Between:
1.SINTHU SUDHAKARA RAO,, S/O SURAYYA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O 4-331, VISAKHA A COLONY, PATHA SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
2.DWARAPU AJITH KUMAR,, S/O GOPALA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O 12-14-18/4, LBS COLONY, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3.DOLA SANKARA RAO,, S/O LATE NARASIMMAPPADU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O 2-5-37, CHINNABONDILIPURAM STREET, SRIKAKULAM ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF A.P., AT AMARAVATHI 2.KUNA SRILATHA, W/O VIVEKANANDA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O KANUGULAVALASA VILLAGE, AMADALAVALASA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1.G SAI NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following:
2
ORDER: Despite the matter having been listed, there has been no representation on behalf of the Petitioners. Even after affording sufficient opportunity, neither the Petitioners nor their Counsel have chosen to appear or prosecute the case. It is also pertinent to observe that the present case constitutes one of the oldest matters pending on the roster. The non- appearance of the Petitioners, despite the long pendency of the matter, reflects a lack of diligence. In view of the absence of representation and the failure to advance
arguments, this Court is of the opinion that the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing the present proceedings. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 07.03.2026 VTS