SHADAB ALAM @ SAHDAB ALAM @ SHADAB BACHCHHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6105/2026 · 2026-07-31
Rajesh Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22546 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22546 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:22698
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6105 of 2026 ---- Shadab Alam @ Shadab Alam @ Shadab Bachchha, aged about 30 years, S/o Aftab Alam, R/o Road No.-3, Sal Bagan, Daiguttu, Zakir Nagar, P.O. & P.S. Azadnagar, Town Jamshedpur, Dist.-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand
…. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus
The State of Jharkhand
…. …. Opposite Party ----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ----
For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha (4), Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, A.P.P. ----
05/Dated: 31st July, 2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State.
2. The applicant, who is in custody since 26.05.2025 has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Chandil P.S. Case No.64 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No.370 of 2025 (S.T. No.201 of 2025), registered for the offence under Sections 109(1), 118(1), 117(1), 351(2), 352, 308(5), 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandil.
3. Earlier prayer for bail of the applicant was rejected by this Court vide order dated 17.02.2026 in B.A. No.10464 of 2025.
4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part.
5. Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that although the charge has been framed on 17.01.2026 but till date not a single witness has been examined. It has further been submitted that the FIR has been lodged against unknown and the name of this applicant has come on the confessional statement of the co-accused. It has also been submitted that one of the co-accused has already been granted bail. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
6.
Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.
2026:JHHC:22698 Page | 2
B.A. No.6105 of 2026
7. Considering the above facts, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chandil in connection with Chandil P.S. Case No.64 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No.370 of 2025 (S.T. No.201 of 2025), subject to condition that the applicant(s) will submit self-attested photocopy/photocopies of his/her/their Aadhaar Card(s) and also submit his/her/their mobile number(s) before the learned Trial Court which he/she/they will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Dated:31st July, 2026 Madhav/- Uploaded on:01/08/2026