APHC010366282011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] MONDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 579/2011 Between: 1. PUJALA @ VUDARAPU LAKSHMI NARAYANAMMA, W/O.NARASIMHA RAO, HINDU R/O.PRAKASH NAGAR, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. VUDURAPA NARASIMHA RAO, S/o.Purnachandra Rao, Hindu RMP Doctor R/o.Near ANkallamma Temple, Bandla Bazar, Karampudi Village, Piduguralla, Guntur District. ...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CMAMP 1064 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased take up the matter expeditiously for hearing to dispose the matter IA NO: 2 OF 2011(CMAMP 5390 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant: 1. CHAKRAVARTHY P V S K Counsel for the Respondent: 1. I GOPAL REDDY The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 579/2011 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) On 17.12.2025, the following order was passed: “Seen the report of mediator. As per the mediator‟s report dated 07.10.2025 forwarded by the mediation centre of this Court, it is mentioned that “it is submitted that I contacted the counsels on record as well as the parties and I am made to understand that the parties are living together”. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has no instructions that the parties are living together or not as the appellant is not in contact. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant prays for time to obtain instructions from the appellant. 4. No representation for the respondent. 5. Considering the report, prima facie we are of the view that in order to maintain viz., neutrality, impartiality, confidentiality and to strengthen the trust in the mediation proceedings the mediator(s) are not expected to contact the parties or their counsel, except while conducting the mediation sessions. 6. The parties or their learned counsels in case of necessity for the reasons viz., non – appearance on the date fixed or to inform the date fixed, should be contacted by some person authorised in the mediation centre and not by the mediators. 7. Post on 19.01.2026.” 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has no instructions from the appellant since long. 3. No representation for the respondent. 4. The matter pertains to the year 2011. 5. In view of the above, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for „want of prosecution‟. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J Dated: 19.01.2026 AG 112 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 579/2011 Dated: 19.01.2026 AG