Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22540 (PNJ)

MAMTA CHOPRA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/6376/2026 · 2026-05-29

Surya Partap Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-6376 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 139 MAMTA CHOPRA STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PARTA directions to respondents No.5 to 9. 2. petitioner has filed the before the respondent No. respondent No. stipulated time. 3. 6376-2026 (O&M) 8587 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH MAMTA CHOPRA VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA Mr. R.K. Sawariya and Mr. P.S. Jnagal, for the petitioner. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner directions to the respondents No.2 to 4 to respondents No.5 to 9. The learned counsel representing the petitioner petitioner has filed the representation dated before the respondent No.3. The learned counsel prays for directions to respondent No.3 to decide the representation of the petitioner stipulated time. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 4. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6376-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 29.05.2026 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH R.K. Sawariya and Mr. P.S. Jnagal, Advocates Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. been filed by the petitioner No.2 to 4 to protect her life and liberty from the sel representing the petitioner submits that dated 16.04.2026 (Annexure P earned counsel prays for directions to representation of the petitioner within to respondents No.1 to 4. (O&M) 2026 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS for her life and liberty from the submits that the P-2) earned counsel prays for directions to the within the GAURAV THAKUR 2026.05.29 19:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6376 upon the State 5. hereby disposed representation of the within a period of is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation level. Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 6376-2026 (O&M) 8587 Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab upon the State is hereby dispensed with. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. representation of the petitioner (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner, and take an independent decision at his own Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab Hence service of notice Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petition is of with a direction to the respondent No.3 to decide the (Annexure P-2) by passing a speaking order from the date of receipt of copy of instant order is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with representation. The respondent No.3 shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of titioner, and take an independent decision at his own :Yes/No : Yes/No Hence service of notice Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petition is to decide the by passing a speaking order from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of titioner, and take an independent decision at his own GAURAV THAKUR 2026.05.29 19:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document