[2026:JHHC:22733] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.2336 of 2025 ------ Kartik Haldhar, son of late Ajit Kumar Haldar, aged about 51 years, H. No. 167, Sankosai Main Road, Near Pipalpar, Dimna Road, P.O. and P.S. Mango, Town Jamshedpur, District – East Singhbhum. … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Ganesh Haldar, son of late Ajit Kumar Haldar 3. Bhawani Haldar, wife of late Ajit Kr. Haldar 4. Bhawani Haldar, wife of late Ajit Kr. Haldar Both 2 and 3 are residents of Main Road Near T.O.P. Dimna Road, P.O. and P.S. Mango, Jamshedpur. 5. Ruby Jha, daughter of Bhogendra Mishra, resident of 49 Lata Nagar Foundary Colony, Main Road, P.O. Baridih, P.S. Sidhgora, Jamshedpur, District – East Singhbhum. … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhyay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : None ------ Order No:-06 Dated:-31-07-2026 Heard the parties. Though notice has been validly served upon the opposite party No.2 yet no one turns up on behalf of the opposite party No.2 in spite of repeated calls. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No. 591 of 2025 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 15.04.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Cr.M.P. No. 591 of 2025 was dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 15.04.2025. It is next submitted that the petitioner was directed to file requisites for service of notice upon the opposite party No.2 to 4 by registered post with A/D as well as under process of the court within a week from the date of that order; failing which, that Cr.M.P. shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Bench but due to mistake of the Advocate’s Clerk, the said requisites could not be filed within the stipulated time; which resulted in dismissal for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 15.04.2025. It is further submitted that non- compliance of the peremptory order dated 15.04.2025 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No. 591 of 2025 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No. 591 of 2025 be restored to its original file. Learned counsel for the State has not raised any serious objection to the prayer of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, Cr.M.P. No. 591 of 2025 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No. 591 of 2025 before the appropriate Bench after a week. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 31.07.2026 Saroj/