Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22534 (AP)

G DAIVA PRASAD v. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

WP/21394/2023 · 2026-01-04

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010363902023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21394/2023 Between: 1. G DAIVA PRASAD, ADVOCATE S/O. LATE NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC. EX-ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR D. NO. 77-25-9, GF-2, ANITHA RESIDENCY, SANTHI NAGAR VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 520 015 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CYBER CRIMES, CID ANNEXE BUILDING, CARLTON HOUSE 1, PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU KARNATAKA - 560 001 EMAIL. SPCTRCID@KSP.GOV.IN 2. DETECTIVE SUBINSPECTPOR, (U. MADHUSUDHAN, DSI 94808 00202) WHITE FIELD POLICE STATION PRESTIGE WHITE MEADOWS WHITE FIELD, SATYA SAI LAY OUT BENGULURU, KARNATAKA STATE - 560 066 EMAIL ADDRESS. CCPWCCID@LKSP.ZOV.IN 3. THE MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, CIVIL COURTS BRANCH, GOVERNORPET, VIJAYAWADA - 520 002 4. MS SHWETHA M G, PH NO.74061 83183 C/O. PRADEEP KUMAR, GCN BRINDAVAN, K. DOMMASANDRA, B.1218, KADUGODI, BANGALORE ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NALLURI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. BHARGAVA RAJU MANTHINA 2. SPL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR CID The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of the writ of mandamus declaring the 2 action of 1 to 3 respondents herein basing on the complaint of the 4th respondent herein and not considering the request made by me dated.10.04.2023 to defreeze of my account no.62080420804 as illegal, arbitrary and also oppose to the Article 14 and 300 of the constitution of India and also direct the 1 to 3 respondents to defreeze my accounts” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of CID. 3. On hearing both sides and on perusal of the material on record, it can been seen that the matter is relating to a case registered in Karnataka by CID. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file appropriate application before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:05.01.2026 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.21394 of 2023 Dt.05.01.2026 Asr