- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30276 RSA No. 2502 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.2502 OF 2011 BETWEEN: 1. CHAMUNDESHWARI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CORPORATION (CESC), O & M DIVISION, MANDYA-571401, REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. H.V.DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. N. KRISHNANANDA GUPTA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. N. SUSHILAKUMARI, W/O LATE SRI SIDDAIAH @ GAVISIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS. 2. S. PRIYANKA, D/O LATE SRI. SIDDAIAH @ GAVISIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS. 3. S. DIVYA, S/O LATE SRI. SIDDAIAH @ GAVISIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS. 4. S. KISAN, S/O LATE SRI. SIDDAIAH @ GAVISIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS. RESPONDENTS 3 AND 4 ARE MINORS, REPRESENTED BY THEIR NEXT FRIEND/NATURAL GUARDIAN THE MOTHER RESPONDENT NO.1. Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30276 RSA No. 2502 of 2011 ALL ARE RESIDENT OF KIRAGAVALU, MALAVALLY TALUK-571430. 5. UNION OF INDIA, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATION, NEW DELHI-110001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 6. DISTRICT TELECOM ENGINEER, MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA-571401. 7. JUNIOR ENGINEER, TELECOM OFFICER, TELEPHONE CENTRE, MALAVALLI-571430. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. HARSHA P. BANAD, CGC FOR R5; SRI. Y HARIPRASAD, CGC FOR R6 AND R7; R3 AND R4 ARE MINORS REPRESENTED BY R1 VIDE ORDER DATED 03.11.2025, APPEAL AGAINST R1 AND R2 DISMISSED) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.7.2011 PASSED IN R.A.NO.302/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, MANDYA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 22.6.2010 PASSED IN O.S.NO.175/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) AND CJM, MANDYA. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30276 RSA No. 2502 of 2011 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL JUDGMENT This Court vide order dated 03.11.2025 dismissed the appeal against respondent Nos.1 and 2, who are the plaintiffs and this second appeal is filed against the decree. When the second appeal is dismissed against the original plaintiffs, this second appeal will not survive for consideration and hence, the second appeal is dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21