Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:562 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 10683 of 2025
------ Bishun Rai, S/o Kushal Ray, R/o Village-Bangavn, P.O. + P.S.-Burmu, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
With B.A. No. 11408 of 2025
Kishun Rai, S/o Kushal Ray, R/o Village-Bangavn, P.O. + P.S.-Burmu, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioners : Mr. Rahul Pandey, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, APP (in BA No.10683/25) For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, APP (in BA No.11408/25)
For the Informant : Mr. Sunil Kumar Upadhyay, Advocate
------
Order No.03 / Dated : 09.01.2026.
It is submitted by the learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner that the prosecution evidence has been examined and the trial is at its penultimate state.
Under the circumstances, this Court is of the view that considering the stage of trial, it will not be proper to grant bail to the petitioners, hence, the prayer for bail of these petitioners, are hereby, rejected.
However, the learned Trial Court is directed to proceed as per Section 346 of the BNSS, 2023 and conclude the trial without any further delay.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Pawan/ Uploaded 12.01.2026