Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22519 (KAR)

SRI ARUN GANDHI v. SMT PREETHI K

CRL.P/5003/2019 · 2026-06-19

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30301 CRL.P No. 5003 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5003 OF 2019 BETWEEN: SRI ARUN GANDHI S/O LATE SADANANDIAH, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT NO.909/A/53, 6TH MAIN, NEAR M.K.AHMAD STORE, VIJAYNAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 040. …PETITIONER [BY SRI TEJAS N., ADVOCATE (AB)] AND: SMT. PREETHI K., W/O ARUN GANDHI, D/O KUMAR ARADHYA, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, R/AT NO.62, 8TH CROSS, AGRAHARA, DASARAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 079. …RESPONDENT [BY SRI B. MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE (AB)] THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS INITIATED AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN CRL.MISC.NO.61/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE VI-M.M.T.C., BANGALORE AS AN ABUSE OF PROCESS OF LAW AND CONSEQUENTLY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30301 CRL.P No. 5003 of 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER On previous occasion, there was no appearance on behalf of parties and matter was adjourned with caution that, in case of continued absence, appropriate orders would be passed. Despite same, there is no representation. This would indicate that parties are not diligent in prosecuting petition. Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE GRD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20