APHC010363782024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18508/2024 Between: 1. ARAMBAKAM RAJA GOPAL, S/O VIJAYASIMHA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O 20-436, SRI KRISHNA DHARMA RAJULA VARI TEMPLE STREET, MULAPETA, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHINNA BAZAR POLICE STATION, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. UDATHA SESHAMMA, W/O JAYARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O 20-1-434, SRI KRISHNA DHARMA RAJULA VARI TEMPLE STREET, MULAPETA, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18508/2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondent Nos.2 and 3 in interfering with the civil disputes without any manner of right and also interfering with petitioner peaceful possession and enjoyment of petitioner site with an extent of 24 ankanams 15 Sq feet of house site bearing Door No. 434 comprised in Sy.No.386-2A of Sri Krishna Dharmarajula Swamy street, Nellore City, SPSR Nellore District without any manner of right as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional, arbitrary, colourable exercise of power and violative of art.21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the above property.…” 2. Heard Sri Sivaprasad Reddy Venati, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the official respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent- police are calling the petitioner to the police station and interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that basing on the application made by the 4th respondent through PGRS before the 2nd respondent, the petitioner was called to the police station for enquiry and no crime has been registered against him, since the subject matter is civil in nature. 4 5. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent-police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.01.2026. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18508/2024 Dated.05.01.2026 UPS