APHC010368782024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18793/2024 Between: 1. NAGUBOINA SATYANARAYANA, S/O VEERA RAGAVAIAH, AGED 65, OCC CULTIVATION R/O DR NO 3-33, GUDIVADA VILLAGE, TENALI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY (HOME DEPARTMENT), VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TALUKA POLICE STATION, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. P KOTESWARA RAO, S/O UNKNOWN, OCCUPATION SUB- INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TALUKA POLICE STATION, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. MUTTHE SATISH, S/O SAMBASIVA RAO, AGED 36 YEARS, R/O ANUMARLAPUDI VILLAGE, PEDAKAKANI MANDAL, MANGALAGIRI. GUNTUR DISTRICT 6. GATTE RAVIKIRAN, S/O SURYA NARAYANA, AGED 33 YEARS, R/O EMANI VILLAGE, DUGGIRALA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 7. GATTE NAVEEN, S/O SURYANARAYANA, AGED 30 YEARS, R/O EMANI VILLAGE, DUGGIRALA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 8. MUTTHE KOTESWARAMMA, W/O SEETHARAMAIAH, AGED 60 YEARS R/O EMANI VILLAGE, DUGGIRALA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents pressurizing the Petitioner to withdraw the Civil Suit in O.S.No. 60 of 2019 pending on the file of Honble Additional Senior Civil Judge, Tenali, Guntur District., at the instance of Respondents 5 to 8 to hand over the Schedule agriculture Land to them and interfering with personal liberty of the petitioner without any legal cause as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondents to forbear from interfering with the personal liberty of the petitioner and his family members not to interfere with the civil disputes and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd and 4th Respondents not to pressurize the Petitioner by summoning to the police station to withdraw the Civil Suit in O.S.No. 60 of 2019 on the file of Additional Senior Civil Judge, Tenali, Guntur District pending disposal of the writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N SRIHARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18793/2024 ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th respondents pressurizing the Petitioner to withdraw the Civil Suit in O.S.No. 60 of 2019 pending on the file of Honble Additional Senior Civil Judge, Tenali, Guntur District., at the instance of Respondents 5 to 8 to hand over the Schedule agriculture Land to them and interfering with personal liberty of the petitioner without any legal cause as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondents to forbear from interfering with the personal liberty of the petitioner and his family members not to interfere with the civil disputes and pass…” 2. No representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that based on the complaint lodged by Gatte Ravikiran-6th respondent, the petitioner was called to the police station for enquiry. After conducting a preliminary enquiry, the police found that the subject matter is purely civil in nature and therefore no crime has been registered against the petitioner. He would further submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 02.01.2026 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18793/2024 Dated. 02.01.2026 KKV 88 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO: WRIT PETITION NO: 18793/2024 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 2. 02.01.2026 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (Vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP, J KKV