- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29511 WP No. 17930 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 17930 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. H VENKATESHA S/O HANUMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/AT NO 10, 1ST 'A' CROSS, KODIGEHALLI, K.R.PURAM, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE 560036. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANTHOSH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE 560009. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BANAGALORE NORTH SUB-DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD, BANGALORE 560009. 3. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, K.R.PURAM, BANGALORE 560036 4. MAHENDRA.A, S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA, Digitally signed by VINUTHA B S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29511 WP No. 17930 of 2026 AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/ AT NO 9, TRIVENI NAGARA, K.R. PURAM, BANGALORE EAST TAULK, BANGALORE 560036 5. K.CHANDRASHEKAR S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT KODEGEHALLI VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALK, BANGALORE 560036 6. S MUNIRATNAMMA W/O KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT NO. 11, JOYTHI NAGARA, REDDYPALYA, HAL, BANGALORE -560017. 7. SURYAKALA K, D/O KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO. 11, OPP. MUNESHWARA TEMPLE, REDDYPALYA, HAL, BANAGALORE 560017. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE. N., HCGP for R.1 to 3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 15.5.2026 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN R.P.No.291/2025 (ANNEXURE-A) AND ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER, QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 16.5.2025 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN R.A. (BE)No.320/2023 (ANNEXURE-B) BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29511 WP No. 17930 of 2026 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 3. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 15.05.2026 passed in R.P.No.291/2025 (ANNEXURE-A) on the file of respondent No.1 and the order dated 16.05.2025 passed in R.A. (BE) No.320/2023 (Annexure-B) by respondent No.2. 3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 4. The petitioner as well as respondent Nos.4 to 7 are claiming right over the property belonging to one Narayanappa and the original grantee Muniyamma. As there is rival claim made to the subject land by the parties and the suit in O.S.No.1067/2020 is pending consideration before the competent Civil Court, I am of the view that no interference is - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29511 WP No. 17930 of 2026 called for in this petition and it is open for the parties to establish their independent right in the suit. 5. In that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE MV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41