( 2026:JHHC:22440 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5075 of 2026 Ajit Choudhary @ Ajit Prasad Choudhary son of Kisan Choudhary … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mrs. Nehala Sharmin, Spl. P.P. --- 04/29.07.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 60 of 2026, for the offences registered under Sections 319 (2)/ 318 (4)/ 338/ 336 (3)/ 340 (2) of the B.N.S. 2023 and under section 66(B)/ 66(C)/ 66(D)/ 84(C) of the I.T. Act, pending in the court of learned Additional Session Judge II cum Cyber Crime Special Court, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody 25.04.2026 and one mobile and two SIM Cards alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner standing in the name of different persons. He submits that the charge sheet has been submitted, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State while opposing the prayer for bail has submitted that petitioner has one criminal antecedent of similar nature and one victim has been identified. The case against petitioner reveals that several e-wallets coupled with use of forged SIM Cards and multiple numbers have been found associated with the seized mobile device to which the petitioner had no sufficient explanation. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the allegations and the mobile and SIM recovered from the possession of the petitioner to which the petitioner had no explanation and further several E-wallet and use of forged SIM Cards were found in the mobile and the petitioner has also one criminal ( 2026:JHHC:22440 ) 2 antecedent, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner above named is rejected. 6. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after a period of six months from today. 7. Let this order be communicated to the concerned court through FAX/e-mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 29.07.2026 Uploaded on: 01.08.2026 Binit/