Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22509 (AP)

K.Venkateswara Rao v. Sri Paruchuri Dinesh

CC/1892/2017 · 2026-02-11

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010362182017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1892/2017 Between: 1. K.VENKATESWARA RAO,, S/0 LATE K. APPA RAO, AGED 47, WORKING AS ADDL.ASSISTANT ENGINEER, OPERATION VIJAYARAI, ELURU DIVISION,PADAVEGI SUB-DIVISION, ELURU CIRCLE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, STATE OF A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI PARUCHURI DINESH, CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, A.P.EASTREN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY, LIMITTED, (APEPDCL), VISAKHAPATNAM, SEETAMMADHARA, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM, DISTRCT, STATE OF A.P. 2. SRI AJAY JAIN, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, STATE OF A.P., ENERGY DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. POLATI NAGESWARA RAO, CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (HRD) APEPDCL, SEETHAMMADHARA, GAJUWAKA VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. T V SURYAPRAKASH RAO, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (OPERATION) APEPDCL, VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. P VEERABHADRA RAO, DIVISIONAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEER, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION, APEPDCL, PADERU, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents for willful disobedance of the Orders passed in WPMP.NO. 14435 OF 2017 IN W.P.N 0. 11600 OF 2017, passed by His Lord Ship Hon'ble Sri Justice P. Naveen Rao 3, dated: 4- 4-2017 under Sections 10 to 12, of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMALINGESWARA RAO KOCHARLA KOTA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1892/2017 ORDER:- The contempt case has been filed for non-compliance with the Order dated 04.04.2017 passed in W.P.M.P.No.14435 of 2017 in W.P. No.11600 of 2017. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.Ch.Staya Dev Naidu, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr.K.Ramalingeswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that, subsequent to the filing of the contempt case, orders passed in W.P.M.P.No.14435 of 2017 in W.P. No.11600 of 2017 are complied with. 3. In view of the orders complied by the respondents, the petitioner is not inclined to pursue the present contempt proceedings against the respondents. 4. Accordingly, recording the above submission, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 12.02.2026 S D P 4 198 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1892/2017 12.02.2026 W S D P