Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22507 (AP)

SRI KARAPAKULA BHASKAR NAIDU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/18359/2024 · 2026-01-05

D Ramesh

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010361752024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 18359/2024 Between: 1. SRI KARAPAKULA BHASKAR NAIDU, S/O PEDDAIAH NAIDU, AGED 61 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O H.NO.2- 144/3, SRI LAKSHMINAGAR, M R PALLI, TIRUPATI TOWN, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 2. NAGINENI SUBRAMANYAM, , S/O LATE NAGINENI CHANGALRAYULU, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O H.N0.22-19-19/A1, RAVINDRA NAGAR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3. SMT.GALI CHINNA REDDAMMA,, W/O GALI ADINARAYANA, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC. HOME MAKER, R/O H.NO.1-1142, BANDLAVANKA VILLAGE, PILER POST, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 4. SMT.KARAPAKULA REDDEMMA, , W/O BHASKAR NAIDU, AGED 56 YEARS, OCC. HOME MAKER, R/O H.NO.2-144/3, SRI LAKSHMI NAGAR, M R PALLI, TIRUPATI TOWN, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT AT TIRUPATI. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI REVENUE DIVISION, TIRUPATI DISTRICT AT TIRUPATI. 4. THUNGA BALAKRISHNA T BALAKRISHNAIAH, S/O.T.PENCHALAIAH, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O.THUMMACHETLAPALLE POST AND VILLAGE, CHITVELI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 5. MR A NISHANTH REDDY, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, OCC MAJOR, PRESENTLY HOLDING THE OFFICE OF REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER AT 2 TIRUPATI, O/O RDO, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 6. THE TAHSILDAR, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 3rd Respondent in passing the impugned order viz., DDis.G/1412/2019 Dt. 19.7.2024 as the same is exfacie illegal, without jurisdiction, arbitrary, unjust, colourable exercise of power and in violation of the fundamental principles of law and set aside the same and consequently direct the 6th Respondent not to take any action on the directions issued in DDis.G/1412/2019 Dt. 19.7.2024 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the order of the 3rd Respondent passed in DDis.G/1412/2019 Dt.19.7.2024 by directing the Respondents not the directions issued in DDis.G/1412/2019to act upon Dt.19.7.2024, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. GOUTHAMI SURAPAREDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. VMR LEGAL The Court made the following: ORDER:- In view of the letter dated 05.01.2026 filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners before the Registry, requesting to post the matter under the caption for withdrawal, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition, permission is accorded. 3 Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the petition shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date : 06.01.2026 RMD 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 18359/2024 Date : 06.01.2026 RMD