Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22505 (JHR)

SHEIKH BADSHAH ALIAS AFSAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./7148/2026 · 2026-07-31

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:22731] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7148 of 2026 ------ Sheikh Badshah @ Afsar, aged about 30yrs. S/o Sekh Mannan, R/o Bansjora Basti Nawagarh, P.O. & P.S. Kharkharee, Dist. Dhanbad. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Someshwar Roy, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-31-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Nawadih P.S. Case No. 57 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 310(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in commission of dacoity and looted gold and silver jewellery and cash of Rs. 4,50,000/- from the house, after beating mother and wife of the informant and also taken away Rs. 10-12 thousand from the shop of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that without putting the petitioner in T.I. Parade as mentioned in para-6 of the bail application, he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused but no recovery has been made. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 16.04.2026 passed in B.A. No. 3015 of 2026. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 22.06.2026 as mentioned in para- 01 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Bermo at Tenughat in connection with Nawadih P.S. Case No. 57 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 31.07.2026 Saroj/