M/S PAIDALA THIRUPATHI REDDY AND BROTHERS v. SRI KANTILAL DANDE
CC/2091/2025 · 2026-03-11
Subba Reddy Satti
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22504 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22504 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010360562025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2091/2025 Between:
1. M/S PAIDALA THIRUPATHI REDDY AND BROTHERS, REP. BY. ITS MANAGING PARTNER, P.THIRUPATHI REDDY S/O. JAYARAMI REDDY, AGE. 50 YEARS, D/O. 1-1226-A, NEAR VINAYAKA TEMPLE,BANGLA THOTA, NAWABPET, NELLORE , ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI KANTILAL DANDE, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ROADS AND BUILDLNGS DEPORTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503.
2. SRI SRI D PADMANABHA REDDY, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ROADS AND BUILDING DIVISION, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
3. SRI M V R VIVEKANANDA REDDY, CHIEF ENGINEER (R AND B), MDR,NH AND CRF .VIJAYAWADA.
4. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, p. 2 deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt. 08.04.2025 of this Hon'ble Court made in WP. No. 17951/2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. DEVASRI ROSHAN KANCHARLA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. Y BALAJI The Court made the following:
:: ORDER ::
The above contempt case was filed complaining of a violation of the order dated 08.04.2025 passed in W.P.No.17951 of 2024.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the order dated 08.04.2025 passed in W.P.No.17951 of 2024 has been complied with and no further adjudication is required in the contempt case.
3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is dismissed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 12.03.2026 JLV p. 3 290 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
CONTEMPT CASE No.2091 OF 2025
Date: 12.03.2026 JLV