Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22499 (PNJ)

LIEUTENANT COLONEL SUNIL BALAWANT PAWAR v. LT. GENERAL PUSHPENDRA PAL SINGH AVSM SM

COCP/2053/2026 · 2026-05-29

Pankaj Jain

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[112] Lieutenant Colonel Sunil Balawant Pawar Lieutenant General Pushpendra Pal Singh, AVSM SM, General Officer Commanding in Chief Western Coram : Present: PANKAJ JAIN [1] speaking order, in Court in CRWP [2] statement. [3] the present contempt petition. The same is ordered to be [4] against the [5] disposed off 29.05.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2053 Date of Decision : Lieutenant Colonel Sunil Balawant Pawar Versus Lieutenant General Pushpendra Pal Singh, AVSM SM, General Officer Commanding in Chief Western Command HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Mr. Rajesh Sehgal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Bhavana Datt, Sr. Panel Counsel **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) At the outset, counsel for the respondent speaking order, in deference to the order Court in CRWP-1982-2026, already stands passed. Counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid statement. In view thereof, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition. The same is ordered to be However, liberty is granted to the petitioner avail against the said order, in accordance with law All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed off. 29.05.2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2053-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 29.05.2026 Lieutenant Colonel Sunil Balawant Pawar …Petitioner Lieutenant General Pushpendra Pal Singh, AVSM SM, General Officer Commanding ….Respondent PANKAJ JAIN Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Bhavana Datt, Sr. Panel Counsel for the respondent-UOI. ounsel for the respondent-UOI states that the the order 20.02.2026 passed by the Writ 2026, already stands passed. petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid hereof, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition. The same is ordered to be disposed off. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner avail his remed in accordance with law, if so advised. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No UOI. states that the 20.02.2026 passed by the Writ petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid hereof, no further order is required to be passed in remedy All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.05.29 17:02 I agree to specified portions of this document