APHC010361542024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18304/2024 Between: 1. BOGGARAPU VENKATA RAMANA, , S/O. B. RAMA SWAMI AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. 4-485, 3RD UPSTAIR, TERU VEEDHI, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 2. BOGGARAPU JYOSNA KALYANI,, W/O B. VENKATA RAMANA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O. 4-485, 3RD UPSTAIR, TERU VEEDHI, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, AP POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MARKAPURAM TOWN POLICE STATION, MARKAPURAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, MARKAPURAM TOWN POLICE STATION, MARKAPURAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 2 1. K CHINNA VENKAT REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18304/2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…to issue any writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.4 in threatening petitioners and calling the petitioners to Police Station and sending the staff to the petitioners house at late hours and demanding the petitioners to register our land in the name of third parties against our will, consent and interest to sell, as illegal and arbitrary and in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in Civil matters and not to summon the petitioners to the police station.…” 2. Heard Sri K.Chinna Venkat Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the official respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the respondent- police are interfering in the civil disputes and insisting the petitioners to register the land of the petitioners in the name of the third parties. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions, would submit that on the complaint of Paruchuri Krishnamurthy, Chittiboina Pandu and Modi Adi Narayana, before the Director General of Police, A.P., Mangalagiri, which was forwarded to the respondent No.4, the respondent-police called the petitioners to the police station for enquiry and no crime has been registered against them, since the subject matter is purely civil 4 in nature. He would further submit that the police never insisted the petitioner to transfer the property in the name of third parties. 5. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent-police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.01.2026. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18304/2024 Dated.05.01.2026 UPS