The Smavesham of Telugu Baptist Church (STBC) v. Dr. M. Purushotham Reddy
CC/744/2016 · 2026-02-17
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22492 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22492 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010362172016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 744/2016 Between:
1. THE SMAVESHAM OF TELUGU BAPTIST CHURCH (STBC), COLLEGE, KURNOOL, REPRESENTED BY ITS CORRESPONDENT REV. RRD SAJEEVA RAJU. 2. DR. HELEN MANORAMA, W/O. ALBERT, AGED 55 YEARS, PRINCIPAL (FAC), STBC COLLEGE, KURNOOL
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. DR M PURUSHOTHAM REDDY, PRINCIPAL, KVR GOVERNMENT DEGREE COLLEGE FOR WOMEN, KURNOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. SRI Y SUBRAHMANAYM, THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, D.T.O. OFFICE, COLLECTORATE COMPLEX, KURNOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents 1 and 2 for willfully disobeying the orders passed by this Hon'ble High Court in W.P.M.P.No. 12868 of 2016 in W.P.No. 10211 of 2016, dated: 29-03-2016 and pass
2
IA NO: 1 OF 2016(APPL 428 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to forthwith receive the pay bills of the first petitioner institution for the months from December, 2015 to March 2016 at the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K VENUGOPAL REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 744/2016 ORDER:-
The contempt case has been filed for non-compliance with the Order dated 29.03.2016 passed in W.P.M.P.No.12868 of 2016 in W.P. No.10211 of
2016. 2. When the matter was taken up, Sri K.Venugopal Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, fairly submits that the main writ petition and batch of cases were disposed on 27.07.2016. In view of the disposal of the main writ petition, the petitioners are not inclined to pursue the present contempt proceedings against the respondents. Sri Ravi Shankar, learned counsel for the respondents is present. 3. Accordingly, recording the above submission, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed.
____________________________________
JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 18.02.2026 S D P
4
283 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 744/2016 18.02.2026
W S D P