Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22489 (AP)

M/S PTR BROTHERS PROJECTS v. SRI KANTILAL DANDE

CC/2183/2025 · 2026-01-01

Subba Reddy Satti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010360522025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2183/2025 Between: 1. M/S PTR BROTHERS PROJECTS, REP. BY. ITS MANAGING PARTNER, P.THIRUPATHI REDDY S/O. JAYARAMI REDDY, AGE 50 YEARS, D/O. 1-1226-A, NEAR VINAYAKA TEMPLE,BANGLA THOTA , NAWABPET, NELLORE , ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI KANTILAL DANDE, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPORTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503. 2. SRI A VENUGOPAL, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ROADS AND BUILDING DIVISION, NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. SRI M V R VIVEKANANDA REDDY, CHIEF ENGINEER (R AND B), MDR, NH AND CRF ,VIJAYAWADA. 4. SRI M GANGADHAR, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (R AND B) R AND B CIRCLE, NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503. ...CONTEMNOR(S): p. 2 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt 08.04.2025 of this Honble Court made in WP. No. 17123/2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DEVASRI ROSHAN KANCHARLA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. Y BALAJI The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case was filed complaining of violation of the order dated 08.04.2025 passed in W.P.No.17123 of 2024. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order dated 08.04.2025 passed in W.P.No.17123 of 2024 has been complied with and no further adjudication is required in the contempt case. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is dismissed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 02.01.2026 IKN