APHC010366912022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22255/2022 Between: 1. SYED CHAN BASHA, S/O SYED KAJUMEIAH, AGED ABOT,T 60 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.SETTIGUNTA VILLAGE AND POST, RAILWAY KODUR TOWN AND MANDAL, ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT). ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAYACHOTY, ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAJAMPETA. ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, , RAILWAY KODUR, ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAILWAY KODUR, ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT. 6. SHAIK HAJARA, W/O. S. LNAYAT, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. SETTIGUNTA VILLAGE AND POST, RAILWAY KODUR MANDAL, ANNAMAIAH DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No 3 to 5 in interfering with the civil dispute by calling the Petitioner to the Police Station regularly without there being any registration of crime against the petitioner, as illegal, improper, unjust, violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to law and consequently direct the Respondents 3 to 5 not to call the petitioner to the police station and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Y MAHA LAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: “ ... to issue appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 3 to 5 in interfering with the civil dispute by calling the Petitioner to the Police Station regularly without there being any registration of crime against the petitioner, as illegal, improper, unjust, violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to law and consequently direct the Respondents 3 to 5 not to call the petitioner to the police station and to pass ...” None represented for the Petitioner. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions would submit that in the light of the interim order passed by this Court on 26.07.2022 in IA No.1 of 2022, respondent Police did not interfere in the civil disputes between the parties and did not call the petitioner to the Police Station and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Considering the submissions made, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, respondent Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 07.01.2026 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 22255 of 2022 07.01.2026 Mjl /*