Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22482 (CAL)

AMIT KR ROY & ORS v. PRABIR ROY (SMT SUKTI SANYAL SINCE DECEASED) AND ORS

FA/204/2019 · 2026-06-10

Rai Chattopadhyay, Rajasekhar Mantha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

10.06.2026 Ct. No.13 Sl. No.22 akd F. A. 204 of 2019 [Amit Kumar Roy & Ors. -Vs- Prabir Roy (Smt. Sukti Sanyal [since deceased]) & Ors.] Mr. Rajkrishna Mondal … … for the appellant Mr. Sanjay Mukherjee Mr. Priyadip Paul Mr. Chiranjit Pal … … for the respondents 1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant does not wish to proceed with the appeal any further. 2. Accordingly, F.A. 204 of 2019 stands dismissed as not pressed. 3. Interim orders, if any, shall stand vacated. 4. Let the trial court records, if any, be sent back to the trial court at the cost of the respondent and such costs be put in by the respondent by tomorrow. 5. There shall be no order as to costs. 6. All parties shall act on a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court (Rajasekhar Mantha, J.) (Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)