Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22480 (KAR)

SRI PUTTAIAH v. SMT NANJAMMA

MSA/158/2026 · 2026-06-19

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30319 MSA No. 158 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 158/2026 (RES) BETWEEN: SRI. PUTTAIAH, S/O. LATE VENKATABHOVI, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, RESIDING AT ANNAHALLI VILLAGE, KYLANCHA HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK, BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT-562159. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. MANJESH H., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.V.KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. NANJAMMA, W/O. LATE MARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.14/1, MUNIMARAKKA GANGAPPA BUILDING, KALKERE MAIN ROAD, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR, NEAR MANJUNATHA TEMPLE, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU-560016. …RESPONDENT THIS MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 READ WITH ORDER 43 RULE 1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30319 MSA No. 158 of 2026 THIS MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Manjesh.H, counsel on behalf of Sri.B.V.Krishnappa., for the appellant appeared in person. 2. The appeal is listed today for orders regarding awaiting TCRs. Counsel submits that due to inadvertence, MSA is filed instead of Civil Revision Petition. Counsel, therefore, submits that the appellant may be permitted to convert the present MSA to that of Civil Revision Petition. 3. Submission is noted. Permission is granted. 4. Appellant is permitted to convert this MSA into Civil Revision Petition. 5. For statistical purpose, the appeal is disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8