KARTICK CHANDRA PAUL AND ANR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
WPA/24473/2023 · 2026-06-10
Jay Sengupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22479 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22479 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
June 10, 2026 AD 4 Ct. 28 SG
WPA 24473 of 2023
Kartick Chandra Paul and another vs. The State of West Bengal and others
Mr. Dilip Kumar Maiti Mr. Maitrayee Maiti
… for the petitioners
Affidavit of service and copy of written instruction, as filed by the petitioners, are taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Municipality has already filed an appeal before the learned District Judge, Burdwan. The petitioners want to raise their objection there instead of prosecuting the present writ petition. On the prayer of learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of requisite formalities.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)