P. KRISHNA REDDY, NELLORE DIST v. B. KHAJA KUMARI, NELLORE DIST
CC/799/2017 · 2026-03-30
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22478 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 22478 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010362002017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 799/2017 Between:
1. P. KRISHNA REDDY, NELLORE DIST, S/O. VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC: CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (UNDER SUSPENSION), KALIGIRI PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY, KALIGIRI VILLAGE & MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, A.P.
...PETITIONER AND
1. B KHAJA KUMARI NELLORE DIST, President, Kaligiri Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society Limited, Kaligiri Village & Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, A.P.
...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon the respondent herein and punish her for willful disobedience of the orders passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.M.P. No. 924 of 2017 in W.P. No. 836 of 2017 dated 5.1.2017, under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts' Act, 1971 and pass
2
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SIVA S LANKA Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. P V VENKATA RAVI SANKAR The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 799 of 2017 ORDER:-
The contempt case has been filed for non-compliance with the order dated 05.01.2017 passed in W.P.M.P.No.924 of 2017 in W.P.No.836 of 2017.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Siva S Lanka, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that, subsequent to the filing of the contempt case, orders passed in W.P.M.P.No.924 of 2017 in W.P.No.836 of 2017 have been complied with.
3. In view of the orders complied by the respondents, the petitioner is not inclined to pursue the present contempt proceedings against the respondents.
4. Accordingly, recording the above submission, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed.
____________________________________
JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 31.03.2026 RMR
4
200 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 799 of 2017 31.03.2026
W RMR