IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 109 CRM-M-32049-2026 Date of Decision: 29.05.2026 KAMAL KUMAR ...PETITIONER Versus STATE OF HARYANA .....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL. Present: Mr. Gourave Bhayyia Gilhotra, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jangra, AAG, Haryana H.S.GREWAL , J (ORAL) Mr. Santosh Kumar Yadav, Advocate appears and filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant in the Court today and the same is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this instant petition has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. (H.S.GREWAL) 29.05.2026 JUDGE renu Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.05.29 15.25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh