Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22470 (JHR)

RAHUL KUMAR ALIAS RAHUL KUMAR GUPTA ALIAS BANTI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5957/2026 · 2026-07-31

Rajesh Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:22677 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5957 of 2026 ---- Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar Gupta @ Banti, aged about 30 years, son of Sri Dilip Prasad Gupta @ Delip Prasad, resident of Mukhiya Danga near Hari Mandir, P.O. & P.S. MGM (Mango), District East Singhbhum, Jharkhand …. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate Mrs. Supriya Dayal, Advocate Mr. Abhay Anand, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kumar Tiwari, A.P.P. ---- 05/Dated: 31st July, 2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State. 2. The applicant, who is in custody since 25.07.2025 has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T. Case No.87 of 2026 arising out of MGM (Mango) P.S. Case No.61 of 2023, for the offence under Sections 364A, 368, 384, 386, 504, 323, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Jamshedpur. 3. Earlier prayer for bail of the applicant was disposed of as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 11.03.2026 in B.A. No.11884 of 2025. 4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part. 5. Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that as per the allegation, it is merely an attempt for the alleged crime but the same could not be committed due to intervention of the villagers. It has been further submitted that although the charge has been framed on 16.03.2026 but till date out of 15 charge-sheeted witnesses only one witness has been examined. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made. 6. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 7. Considering the above facts, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on 2026:JHHC:22677 Page | 2 B.A. No.5957 of 2026 furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Jamshedpur in connection with S.T. Case No.87 of 2026 arising out of MGM (Mango) P.S. Case No.61 of 2023, subject to condition that the applicant(s) will submit self-attested photocopy/photocopies of his/her/their Aadhaar Card(s) and also submit his/her/their mobile number(s) before the learned Trial Court which he/she/they will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Dated: 31st July, 2026 Madhav/- Uploaded on:01/08/2026