APHC010365822024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18682/2024 Between: 1. GOLLAPALLI NAGA LAKSHMI,, W/O GOLLAPALLI SRINIVASA RAO, AGE 38 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O 3-4-34, NEAR OLD SUGALI COLONY, 3RD WARD, SATTENAPALLE, PALNADU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. GOLLAPALLI SRINIVASA RAO,, S/O GOLLAPALLI VENKATRAO, AGED 40 YEARS, OCC CONSTRUCTION WORKER. R/O 3-4-34, NEAR OLD SUGALI COLONY, 3RD WARD, SATTENAPALLE, PALNADU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTRICT, NPS COLONY, NARASARAOPET. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, SATENAPALLE SUB- DIVISION, SATTENAPALLE. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SATENAPALLE URBAN, SATTENAPALLE. 5. RAYI VENKATA RAO, S/O SEETHARAMAIAH, R/O GANDLURU VILLAGE, SATTENAPALLE MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. JALAJALA APPA RAO, S/O NARAYANA, R/O GANDLURU VILLAGE, SATTENEPALLE MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 7. DUGGEMPUDI SESHAIAH, S/O YARRAIAH R/O GANDLURU VILLAGE, SATTENEPALLE MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 8. NALAJALA SATYANARAYANA, S/O VENKATESWARLU, R/O GANDLURU VILLAGE, SATTENEPALLE MANDAL, PALNADU 2 DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. GOUTHAMI SURAPAREDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a Writ, one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Direction or Order declaring the action of respondents no.4 in colluding with the respondents no. 5 to 8 (defendants in the OS. No. 448/2023) and calling the petitioner to the police station under the influence of the respondents no. 5 to 8 and harassing the petitioners without there being any crime registered against the petitioners to make an undue favor to the respondents no. 5 to 8 herein as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21, 300 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the police officials not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the respondents no. 5 to 8, by calling the petitioners to the police station, without any crime registered against the petitioners” 2. Heard Smt Gouthami Surapareddy, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the police are not calling the petitioners to the police station and are not insisting upon them to extend any undue favour to the unofficial respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petition may be disposed of by recording the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3 5. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:05.01.2026 Asr 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.18682 of 2024 Dt.05.01.2026 Asr