IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.15839 of 2026 Decided on: 11th September, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jindo Kumar …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Angrez Kapoor, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajat Choudhry, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Dikken Kumar Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.4. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Rajat Choudhry, learned Assistant Advocate General and Mr. Dikken Kumar Thakur, learned counsel, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 and respondent No.4, respectively. 2. Petitioner seeks applicability of Amar Singh Versus State of HP and another2. It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioner has not preferred any 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 O.A. No.2054 of 2019, decided by the erstwhile H.P. Administrative Tribunal on 01.07.2019 2 representation for the redressal of his grievances raised in the writ petition. 3. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 11, 2026 Judge Mukesh