Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22467 (JHR)

MUJAHID ANSARI @ MISTER v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6829/2026 · 2026-07-31

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:22682 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6829 of 2026 Mujahid Ansari @ Mister, son of Kabetullah Ansari … … Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashish Kr. Thakur, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Satish Prasad, APP --- 04/31.07.2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 10.04.2026 in connection with Sundarpahari P.S. Case No.07 of 2026, registered under Sections 103 (1)/85/3(5) of the BNS Act, 2023 now pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Godda. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the face of the F.I.R itself, it is stated that the marriage of the deceased was solemnized with the petitioner about 12-13 years ago, and one son and two daughters were also born out of the wedlock. The F.I.R. further mentions that the petitioner has been living outside for earning and the allegations are that the father-in-law and mother-in-law used to torture the deceased physically and mentally. It is also alleged that there were repeated efforts at conciliation and the deceased ultimately died by committing suicide. However, the charge sheet has been submitted under Section 108 of BNS and as per the impugned order, the cause of death was asphyxia as a result of antemortem hanging. The petitioner is in custody since 10.04.2026 and the charge sheet has already been submitted. 4. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 5. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that the charge sheet has been submitted under 2026:JHHC:22682 2 Section 108 of BNS and that as per the F.I.R. itself, the marriage has solemnized about 12-13 years prior to the occurrence and the petitioner, who is the husband of the deceased, used to reside outside for earning, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Godda in connection with Sundarpahari P.S. Case No.07 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:31.07.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:01.08.2026