- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29073 WP No. 29832 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 29832 OF 2024 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: SRI A K SUKUMAR AGED 71 YEARS, S/O LATE A.N KRISHNA MURTHY RESIDING AT NO. 245/409, 8TH CROSS, SHASTRI NAGAR, BANGALORE - 70 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KALPANA SUKUMAR., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE (BBMP), HUDSON CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560002 2. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BBMP WARD NO 143, VISVESHWARAPURAM SUB DIVISION, ABOVE CLINIC 7TH MAIN 7TH CROSS, 2ND BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BENGALURU - 560011 Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29073 WP No. 29832 of 2024 3. SRI RAHUL KUMAR AGED AMJOR, S/O CHAMPALALA, 4. SRI. CHAMPALAL AGED MAJOR S/O. NOT KNOWN R4 AND R5 ARE R/AT NO. 29/2 YELLAPPA STREET MAVALLI, BANGALORE-04 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR.,ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI. M.S. VENUGOPAL, ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF TE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE NATURE WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO THE R-1 AND 2 TO DEMOLISH ILLEGAL AND AUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTIONS MADE OVER IN THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY BY THE R-3 AND 4 BY CONSIDERING THE REPRESENTATION OF PETITIONERS DATED 10.10.24, AT ANNEXURE J-1, 14.10.24 AT ANNEXURE J-2 AND LEGAL NOTICE DATED 23.10.2024 AT ANNEXURE- K ADDRESSED TO THE RESPONDENT NO.1 AND 2 IN ALL FORTHWITH. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:29073 WP No. 29832 of 2024 ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo for withdrawal which reads as under. "It is submitted that, the petitioner filed the above writ petition against the respondent No.1 to 4, seeking writ of directions aggrieved by the construction undertaken by the respondent No.3 and 4., and also sought for Interim relief to stay their construction work pending disposal of the petition. Now the petitioner and respondent No.3 and 4 resolved their dispute out side court. Under these circumstances the above petition become infructuous. Hence the petitioner intends to withdraw the above petition and pray that this Hon'ble court may pleased to dismiss the above petition as not pressed in the interest of justice and equity." The memo is taken on record and the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE RB