Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22463 (CHH)

Md. Shamim Ansari v. SMT. NAJNIN PARVIN

CRMP/2583/2019 · 2026-06-18

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:24933 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2583 of 2019 1 - Md. Shamim Ansari S/o Md. Sarfuddin Aged About 30 Years Caste Muslim, Occupation Auto Driver, R/o Kantiprakashpur (Luchki) Police Station And Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. (Revisioner) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Smt. Najnin Parvin W/o Md. Shamim Ansari Aged About 25 Years Caste Muslim Occupation House Wife, R/o Imlipara, Police Station And Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None. For Respondent/ State : Mr. Priyank Rathi, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 19/06/2026 1 None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition. 2 Mr. Priyank Rathi, learned Govt. Advocate, appearing for the KRISHNA KUMAR BARVE Digitally signed by KRISHNA KUMAR BARVE Date: 2026.06.19 20:55:45 +0530 2 State/respondent, is present. 3 By filing the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for following relief(s) :- “It is therefore prayed that, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and set aside the order impugned dated 14.10.2019 passed by the learned 5th Upper Session Judge, Ambikapur District – Surguja (C.G.) in Criminal Revision No.80/2018 ANNEXURE A- 1, or direct the revisional court to decide the matter within stipulated period in the interest of justice.” 4 As per the status report received, the trial has already been concluded on 16.11.2021. In view of the above, the relief sought in the present petition has become infructuous as nothing survives for consideration in this petition by this Court. 5 Consequently, the present Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 6 Interim order, if any stands vacated. 7 Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information. Sd/- Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Barve