APHC010361942015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: Between: 1. SRI PANTHULA NAGARAJA GURUKUL,, S/O. SRI PANTHULA VENKATESWARA GURUKUL, AGED 28 YEARS, OCC: TANTRACHARYA, R/O. 4/578, SANNIDHI STREET, SRIKALAHASTI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 1. SRI B RAMI REDDY, KALAHASTEESWARA SWAMY DEVASTHANAM, SRIKALAHASTI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V S K RAMA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. A SREEKANTH REDDY(SC FOR ENDOW RS) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1141 OF 2015 SRI PANTHULA NAGARAJA GURUKUL,, S/O. SRI PANTHULA VENKATESWARA GURUKUL, AGED 28 YEARS, OCC: TANTRACHARYA, R/O. 4/578, SANNIDHI STREET, SRIKALAHASTI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND SRI B RAMI REDDY, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI KALAHASTEESWARA SWAMY DEVASTHANAM, SRIKALAHASTI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Contemnor: A SREEKANTH REDDY(SC FOR ENDOW RS) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3504] FRIDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM SRI PANTHULA NAGARAJA GURUKUL,, S/O. SRI PANTHULA VENKATESWARA GURUKUL, AGED 28 YEARS, OCC: TANTRACHARYA, R/O. 4/578, SANNIDHI STREET, SRIKALAHASTI, ...PETITIONER OFFICER, SRI KALAHASTEESWARA SWAMY DEVASTHANAM, SRIKALAHASTI, ...CONTEMNOR THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1141 OF 2015 ORDER:- The contempt case has been filed for non-compliance with the Order dt.30.03.2015 passed in W.P.M.P.No.8467 of 2015 in W.P.No.6369 of 2015. 2. When the matter was taken up, Mr. V.S.K.Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that the main writ petition was disposed of, vide order, dated 23.02.2023. In view of the disposal of the main writ petition, the petitioner is not inclined to pursue the present contempt proceedings against the respondent. 3. Accordingly, recording the above submission, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 20.02.2026 KK