[2026:RJ-JP:16583] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1780/2026 Hemant Verma Son Of Satyanarayan, Resident Of 675, Indira Awasiya Colony, Rajmahal, Tonk , Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Meena Devi Wife Of Late. Laddu Lal Raigar, Resident Of Rajmahal, Dooni, Tonk, Currently Resident At Ambapura Colony, Deoli, Tonk, Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8367/2025 Satyanarayan Son Of Bheevaram, Resident Of 675,indira Awasiya Colony, Rajmahal, Tonk, Currently Asi Police Station Todaraising ( Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Meena Devi Wife Of Late Laddu Lal Raigar, Resident Of Rajmahal , Dooni, Tonk, Currently Residing At Ambapura Colony, Deoli, Tonk ( Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Jhingonia, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 20/04/2026 1- ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls mijksDr nksuksa ;kfpdk,a varxZr /kkjk 528 ch-,u-,l-,l- ds rgr ifjokfn;k&izR;FkhZ dh vksj ls iqfyl Fkkuk&nsoyh] Vksad esa iathc) djok;h x;h izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 224@2025 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 303¼2½] 318¼2½] 316¼2½] 351¼2½ [2026:RJ-JP:16583] (2 of 4) [CRLMP-1780/2026] ch-,u-,l- dks fujLr fd;s tkus gsrq izLrqr dh x;h gSaA pwafd nksuksa ;kfpdk,a ,d gh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ls lacaf/kr gSa] vr% fuLrkj.k ,d gh vkns'k ds ek/;e ls fd;k tk jgk gSA 2- fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kphx.k dk fuosnu gS fd vfHk;qDr gseUr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa uketn ugha gS] mlds [kkrs esa tks jkf'k vUrfjr gqbZ gS] og le;&le; ij vfHk;qDr&izkFkhZ }kjk ifjokfn;k ds ifr ds vafre laLdkj o vU; [kpksZa ds iquHkqZxrku dh vnk;xh ds laca/k esa dh x;h gS] ekeyk flfoy izd`fr dk gSA blh izdkj vfHk;qDr lR;ukjk;.k ds fo:) Hkh izFken`"V;k dksbZ ekeyk ugha gksuk crkrs gq, mijksDr vk/kkjksa ij ;g izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA 3- fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk ;kfpdk dk fojks/k djrs gq, tkfgj fd;k fd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa of.kZr rF;ksa ds vk/kkj ij laKs; vijk/k ds rRo izdV gks jgs gSa] bu ;kfpdkvksa ds ek/;e ls vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk fy, x;s cpko fopkj.k dk fo"k; gS] vUr esa ;kfpdk,a [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA 4- nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksaZ ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA 5- orZeku izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa ifjoknh Jherh ehuk }kjk ;g fjiksVZ ntZ djk;h gS fd fnukad 04-03-2025 dks mlds ifr dh lM+d nq?kZVuk esa e`R;q gks x;h Fkh] ftldh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ mlds tsB lR;ukjk;.k tks fd iqfyldehZ gS] ds }kjk ntZ djk;h x;h rFkk ifjokfn;k dh izfrdwy fLFkfr dk ykHk mBkdj mlds tsB us ykypo'k ifjokfn;k o mlds ifr ds dCts'kqnk dejs esa j[ks cDls dk rkyk rksM+dj nLrkost o eksckbZy pqjk fy;s vkSj Qksu&is ds tfj;s cnfu;friwoZd jkf'k fudky yhA vHkh rd gq, vuqla/kku ls vfHk;qDr gseUr ds [kkrs esa mijksDrkuqlkj le;&le; ij jkf'k vUrfjr gqbZ gS] tks vfHk;qDr lR;ukjk;.k dh lgk;rk ls mlds [kkrs esa vUrfjr gksuk crk;k gSA 6- ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk State of Uttar Pradesh and Anrs. Vs. Akhil Sharda and Ors with Sanjeet Jaiswal Vs. State of Uttar [2026:RJ-JP:16583] (3 of 4) [CRLMP-1780/2026] Pradesh and Ors. 2022 SCC OnLine SC 820 ds iSjk la[;k&07 esa ;g O;oLFkk izfrikfnr dh x;h gS%& "7. Having gone through the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court by which the High Court has set aside the criminal proceedings in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., it appears that the High Court has virtually conducted a mini trial, which as such is not permissible at this stage and while deciding the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. As observed and held by this Court in a catena of decisions no mini trial can be conducted by the High Court in exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. jurisdiction and at the stage of deciding the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court cannot get into appreciation of evidence of the particular case being considered." 7- blh izdkj ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk Kamaladevi Agarwal V. State of W.B. & Ors. (2002) 1 SCC 555 ds iSjk la[;k&07 esa ;g O;oLFkk izfrikfnr dh x;h gS%& "7. This Court has consistently held that the revisional or inherent powers of quashing the proceedings at the initial stage should be exercised sparingly and only where the allegations made in the complaint or the FIR, even if taken it at the face value and accepted in entirety, do not prima facie discolse the commission of an offence. Disputed and controversial facts cannot be made the basis for the exercise of the jurisdiction." 8- mijksDr U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj Li"V gS fd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dks fujLr djkus gsrq vUrfuZfgr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx djrs le; izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa of.kZr vkjksi rFkk vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls fy, x;s cpko o vU; lkexzh dh lR;rk] fo'oluh;rk vkfn ds laca/k esa laf{kIr tkap vFkok laf{kIr fopkj.k vuqKs; ugha gSA orZeku ekeys esa izFke [2026:RJ-JP:16583] (4 of 4) [CRLMP-1780/2026] lwpuk fjiksVZ esa of.kZr rF;ksa ds vk/kkj ij laKs; vijk/k ds rRo izdV gks jgs gSaA ;g izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ U;k;ky;hu izfdz;k dk nq:i;ksx djus gsrq ntZ djk;h x;h gks] ,slk Li"V ekeyk ugha gS rFkk yxk;s x;s vkjksi vius vki esa vlaHkkO; gks] ,slh fLFkfr Hkh ugha gSA vfHk;qDr }kjk tks cpko fy;s x;s gSa] os fopkj.k ds nkSjku lqlaxr gks ldrs gSaA vfHk;qDr }kjk fy, x;s cpko ek= vk/kkj ij izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dks fujLr fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dks fujLr djus gsrq vUrfuZfgr 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx la;r rjhds ls o iw.kZ lko/kkuh ds lkFk visf{kr gSA lkekU; :i ls tc rd lqn`< vk/kkj ugha gksa] vuqla/kku vFkok fopkj.k dh izfdz;k dks jksdk tkuk vFkok ckf/kr fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA 9- mijksDr foospkukuqlkj izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ fujLr djus gsrq /kkjk 528 ch-,u-,l-,l- ds rgr {ks=kf/kdkfjrk dk iz;ksx gLrxr ekeys esa fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA 10- ifj.kker% mijksDr nksuksa ;kfpdk,a [kkfjt dh tkrh gS] LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Hkh mDr izdkj ls vLohdkj fd;s tkrs gSaA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J Mittal /31-32