Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22459 (MAD)

Manoharan v. G.Lakshmi

CMP(MD)/3275/2026 · 2026-04-22

P Vadamalai

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP(MD) NOS. 3275 to 3277 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22-04-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.VADAMALAI CMP(MD) NOS. 3275 to 3277 of 2026 in AS(MD) NO. 232 of 2022 Manoharan through his power agent N. Ramesh Petitioner(s) in all petitions Vs 1.G.Lakshmi 2.G.Mathiyarasan 3.G.Ravichandran 4.M.Thilaga 5.G.Mahendran (Died) 6.Shashikala 7.Leena Respondent(s) in all petitions For Petitioner(s) in all petitions : Mr.T.Selvan, Advocate 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD) NOS. 3275 to 3277 of 2026 For Respondent(s) in all petitions : Mr.V.Meenakshi Sundaram Advocate for R1 to R4 R5 – Died R6 & R7 – No Appearance Common Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and Order XXII Rule 9(2) and Order XXII Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure to condone the delay of 333 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due the death of the 5th respondent, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 5th respondent, and to bring on record the proposed respondents 6 and 7 as the legal heirs of the deceased 5th respondent and rank them as respondents 6 and 7 in A.S.(MD)No.232 of 2022 on the file of this Court. COMMON ORDER These Civil Miscellaneous Petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 333 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due the death of the 5th respondent, to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 5th respondent, and to bring on record the proposed respondent Nos.6 & 7 as the legal heirs of the deceased 5th respondent and rank them as respondent Nos.6 & 7 in A.S.(MD)No.232 of 2022 on the file of this Court. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD) NOS. 3275 to 3277 of 2026 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the common affidavit filed in support of these petitions. 3. The learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 4 has not raised any serious objection to these petitions. 4. The names of the 6th and 7th respondents have been printed in the cause list. 5. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed. 22-04-2026 Note : The Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the appeal memorandum. mkn 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP(MD) NOS. 3275 to 3277 of 2026 P.VADAMALAI, J. mkn CMP(MD) NOS. 3275 to 3277 of 2026 in AS(MD) NO. 232 of 2022 22.04.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis