APHC010361332021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5479/2021 Between: 1.BUKKA SHILPA, D/O. B. HAJE NAIK, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O, RAMANAYAK THANDA, MUSALIKUNTA PANCHAYATHI, PEDDAMANDYAM, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2.M. NEELUBAI @ NEELAVATHI, W/O. M. BABU NAIK, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, BASIREDDIGARI PALLI, JANDLA, PILERU, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3.M. SUMALATHA, W/O. MUDE RAMESH NAIKU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, 18-68, CHINNA BIDIKI, SETTIPALLE, SAMBEPALLI, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT. 4.MUDE RAMESH NAIK, S/O MUDE SREERAMULU NAIKU,AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, 18-68, CHINNA BIDIKI, SETTIPALLE, SAMBEPALLI, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT. 5.B. PUSHPA, W/O DORA SWAMY NAIK, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O, D/O 1-40, PREMNAGAR, PEDDAMADYAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6.B. DORASWAMY NAIK, S/O LATE B. MALLU NAIK, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O, D/O 1-40, PREMNAGAR, PEDDAMADYAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI. 2 2.VADUTHE SUNITHA, W/O, BUKKE MADHUSUDHAN, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O SIDDAREDDY PALEM, DAGADARTHI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.V ROOPESH KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Sri A.Sai Rohith, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that in the present matter, a chargesheet has already been filed in C.C.No.433/2022 on the file of the learned Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kovur, SPSR Nellore District. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioners to challenge the chargesheet, if so advised, and if the same is still pending consideration before the learned Trial Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 09.03.2026 VTS