IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.15689 of 2026 Decided on: 11th September, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fizodeen …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Ms. Archna Dutt, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1, 2 and 4. Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, learned counsel, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1, 2 & 4 and respondent No.3, respectively. 2. Petitioner’s grievance is that his representation dated 06.06.2026 (Annexure P-8) seeking applicability of Shishu Pal Versus State of H.P. & others2 has not been 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No.1061 of 2021, decided alongwith connected matter on 17.07.2025 2 decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/ competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents are not averse to this prayer. 3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-8) in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 11, 2026 Judge Mukesh