1 2026:HHC:38823 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.06 of 2026 Date of Decision: 11.09.2026 ___________________________________________________ Ravinder Singh ....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another …Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Atul G. Sood, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 10.09.2026, in which, it has been stated that after receiving the necessary approval from the Government, the budget has been allocated to the concerned Principal on 10.09.2026 for further disbursement to the petitioner and the same will be disbursed to him shortly. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:38823 2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and, accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. Notice discharged. 3. However, the petitioner is at liberty to revive the present contempt petition, if occasion arises to do so. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) September 11, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi)