Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22448 (CHH)

SHAMSHAD HUSAIN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRR/54/2019 · 2026-06-18

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:24930 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 54 of 2019 1 - Shamshad Husain S/o Shri Bafta Husain Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Gopi, Mahka Police Station Kharsiya District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Ganj, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 19/06/2026 1 None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition. 2 Mr. Priyank Rathi, learned Govt. Advocate, appearing for the State/respondent, is present. 3 By filing the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for following relief(s) :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARVE Digitally signed by KRISHNA KUMAR BARVE Date: 2026.06.19 21:32:27 +0530 2 “It is, therefore, prayed that the Hon’ble High Court may kindly be pleased to allow this revision and discharge the applicant from the charges u/s 376 (2)(<) and 506 of I.P.C. framed by the A.S.J. (F.T.C.) Raipur (C.G.), in the interest of justice.” 4 As per the status report received, the trial has already been concluded on 20.10.2023. In view of the above, the relief sought in the present petition has become infructuous as nothing survives for consideration in this petition by this Court. 5 Consequently, the present Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 6 Interim order, if any stands vacated. 7 Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information. Sd/- Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Barve