Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22448 (AP)

Smt Kola Rama Laxmi v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/18402/2024 · 2026-01-04

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010363362024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18402/2024 Between: 1. SMT KOLA RAMA LAXMI, S/O LATE SRIRIIVASARAO, AGED 50 YEARS, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, AMARAVATHI, 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM RURAL, POLICE STATION, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. JAKKAMANMADHA RAO, S/O LATE GANNAYYA, AGED 60 YEARS, KATCHERLAPETA (V AND P) AMUDALAVALASA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. KINJARAPU SRI RAMULU, S/O LATE KRISTAMMA, AGED 58 YEARS, LINGAMVALASA VILLAGE, SRIKAKULAMMANDAL AND DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VAKA RAMA KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18402/2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…to issue a writ. order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering in civil matters between the petitioner and 4th and 5th respondents as illegal, arbitrary and violative of provisions of the Constitution of India and settled legal principles and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in the civil disputes and do not entertain request made by 4th and 5th respondents which fall in civil nature.…” 2. None represented on behalf of the petitioner. The present writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondent-police in interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that the respondent police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Recording the same, this Writ petition is disposed of. However, the respondent-police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.01.2026. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18402/2024 Dated.05.01.2026 UPS