Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:38528
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
COPC No.1193 of 2026 In CWP No.11020 of 2025
Decided on: 10.09.2026. ________________________________________________________
Nirmla Devi
...Petitioner
Versus
Dr. Amarjeet K. Sharma,
...Respondent Director Higher Education
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?.
For the petitioner:
Mr. Shagun Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondent: Mr. Varun Chandel,
Additional Advocate General.
Ranjan Sharma, Judge [Oral]
Petitioner, Nirmla Devi, has invoked contempt jurisdiction of this Court against non- compliance of the
judgment dated 10.07.2025 [Annexure C-1] passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, in CWP No.11020 of 2025, titled Nirmla Devi v. State of H.P. and Others, whereby respondents/ competent authority was directed to decide the representation [Annexure P-5, in said writ petition] within six weeks in accordance with law.
3.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2026:HHC:38528
- 2 - that the representation has not been decided.
4.
Heard.
5.
Notice. Mr. Varun Chandel, Learned Additional Advocate General, accepts and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
6.
With the consent of Learned Counsel for the parties, this Court disposes of the instant Contempt Petition, with direction to Respondent/Competent Authority to comply with the
judgment dated 10.07.2025 [Annexure C-1] within a period of three weeks from today.
7.
In case, representation already stands decided, the orders on the representation be conveyed to the petitioner within the above period.
In aforesaid terms, the Contempt Petition and all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of, accordingly.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge September 10, 2026
[Shivender]