Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22444 (CHH)

PURUSHOTTAM YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRR/163/2024 · 2026-06-18

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:25098 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 163 of 2024 Purushottam Yadav S/o Ratiram Yadav Aged About 60 Years R/o Village- Mordha, Thana- Mahasamund, Tahsil And Dist.- Mahasamund, C.G. ...Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through The District Magistrate Mahasamund, Dist.- Mahasamund, C.G. ... Respondent (Cause title taken from the case information system) For Applicant : Shri Shivendu Pandya, Advocate. For Respondent/ State : Ms. Sameeksha Gupta, PL. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 19.06.2026 1. Heard Shri Shivendu Pandya, learned Counsel for the applicant as also heard Ms. Sameeksha Gupta, learned Panel Lawyer for the State. GOURI MUDALIAR Digitally signed by GOURI MUDALIAR Date: 2026.06.20 13:27:31 +0530 2 2. By way of the present revision, the applicant has prayed for the following prayer:- “It is therefore, prayed that the Revision petition may kindly be allowed and the order impugned dated 21.12.2021 passed in Criminal Appeal No.57/2019 may kindly be set aside and the petitioner may kindly be acquitted from the charges, in the interest of justice.” 3. As per the status report received, the trial has already been concluded on 29/04/2025. In view of the same, the relief sought in the present revision has become infructuous as nothing survives for consideration in this revision by this Court. 4. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 5. Interim order, if any stands vacated. 6. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court for necessary information. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice gouri