Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22442 (CAL)

BIRENDRA PATRA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM(M)/967/2026 · 2026-06-10

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

10.06.2026 Serial no. 202 [G.S.D] CRM (M) 967 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023. -And- In the matter of : Birendra Patra … Petitioner(s) Mr. Kaustav Das … for the Petitioner(s) Ms. Nayana Mukhopadhyay … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner, on instruction, submits that the petitioner is no more desirous to proceed with the bail application further. Ms. Nayana Mukhopadhyay, learned advocate, empanelled with the State of West Bengal is directed to represent the State. Her appointment may be regularized by the concerned authority. In view of the submission advanced by the learned advocate for the petitioner, CRM (M) 967 of 2026 is dismissed as not pressed. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 2