Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22440 (CHH)

KAMAL MAITY v. DR. RAVISHANKAR NAYAK

CRMP/1636/2022 · 2026-06-18

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:25065 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1636 of 2022 1 - Kamal Maity S/o Shri Khagendranath Maiti, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Sikola Bhata, Akash Nagar, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner versus 1 - Dr. Ravishankar Nayak S/o Late Ganpat Lal Nayak, Aged About 77 Years, R/o Ward No. 23, Four Season Hotel, Station Road Durg, Tehsil And District- Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - Sanjay Singh S/o Shri Veer Bahadur Singh, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Ward No. 23, Four Season Hotel, Station Road Durg, Tehsil And District- Durg, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Ms. Shalini Kashyap, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, Advocate. For Respondents : None. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 19.06.2026 1. Heard Ms. Shalini Kashyap, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. By filing the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- SOURABH PATEL Digitally signed by SOURABH PATEL Date: 2026.06.20 16:25:23 +0530 2 • It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that, considering the totality of the circumstances of the case, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to: (I) Call for the records of Criminal Case Nos. RCC/4316/2022, RCC/34317/2018 & RCC/34316/2018 pending before the learned JMFCs, Durg, C.G.; and (ii) Allow the instant petition and direct analogous hearing of Criminal Case Nos. RCC/4316/2022, RCC/34317/2018 & RCC/34316/2018 pending before the learned JMFCs, Durg, C.G. 3. As per the status report received, the trial has already been concluded on 21.01.2026. In view of the same, the relief sought in the present petition has become infructuous, as nothing survives for consideration in this petition by this Court. 4. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Sourabh P.