RAJESH KUMAR S/O VISHAMBHAR, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/279/2026 · 2026-04-20
Uma Shanker Vyas
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2244 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2244 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:16694] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 279/2026 Rajesh Kumar S/o Vishambhar, R/o Rudaval, Police Station Rudaval, District Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Superintendent Of Police, Bharatpur. 4. The Station House Officer, Police Station Rudaval, District Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himmat Singh Bikarwar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 20/04/2026 fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&ifjoknh dk fuosnu gS fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkns'k fnukad 29-11-2025 esa fn;s x;s funsZ'kksa ds ckotwn iqfyl }kjk fookfnr nLrkost dh ,Q-,l-,y- tkap ugha djk;h x;h gS] vr% bl laca/k esa mfpr vkns'k fn;s tkosaA vkns'k fnukad 29-11-2025 ds voyksdu ls Li"V gS fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ;g vkns'k fn;k gS fd ;fn vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh vko';d le>s rks ,Q-,l-,y- ls nLrkost dh tkap djkos] fdUrq dksbZ Li"V vkns'k ugha gSA vuqla/kku fdl :i esa fd;k tkos] bl ckcr~ dksbZ Hkh U;k;ky; fof'k"V funsZ'k nsus gsrq vf/kd`r ugha gS] ysfdu fu"i{k vuqla/kku gks ;g lqfuf'pr djus gsrq lacaf/kr eftLVªsV U;k;ky; vf/kd`r gSA
[2026:RJ-JP:16694] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-279/2026] ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk U;kf;d n`"Vkar Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. & Ors. AIR 2008 SC 907 ds ekeys esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd fu"i{k vuqla/kku dks lqfuf'pr djus gsrq lacaf/kr eftLVªsV U;k;ky; vuqla/kku dks eksfuVj djus o vko';d funsZ'k nsus gsrq l{ke gS rFkk ,sls ekeyksa esa lkekU; :i ls /kkjk 528 ch-,u-,l-,l-@482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gS rFkk ,slh izo`fRr fu:Rlkfgr gksus ;ksX; gSA bl fu.kZ; ds iSjk la[;k 15 o 25 lqlaxr gSa tks fuEukuqlkj gS&
"15. Section 156(3) provides for a check by the Magistrate on the police performing its duties under Chapter XII Cr.P.C. In cases where the Magistrate finds that the police has not done its duty of investigating the case at all, or has not done it satisfactorily, he can issue a direction to the police to do the investigation properly, and can monitor the same. 25.
We have elaborated on the above matter because we often find that when someone has a grievance that his FIR has not been registered at the police station and/or a proper investigation is not being done by the police, he rushes to the High Court to file a writ petition or a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. We are of the opinion that the High Court should not encourage this practice and should ordinarily refuse to interfere in such matters, and relegate the petitioner to his alternating remedy, firstly under Section 154(3) and Section 36 Cr.P.C. before the concerned police officers, and if that is of no avail, by approaching the concerned Magistrate under Section 156(3)." mijksDr fof/kd O;oLFkk vkfn dks ns[krs gq, ;kph&ifjoknh dks ;g funsZ'k fn;k tkrk gS fd og lacaf/kr eftLVªsV@U;k;ky; ds le{k viuk i{k j[kus gsrq vkosnu is'k dj ldrk gSA blh fVIi.kh ds lkFk ;g ;kfpdk fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gSA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J Mittal /78